The bar chart describes the percentage of men and women doing housework tasks and average time in a country in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart give information about the rate of male and females doing housework tasks and mean times in a country in 2010.
Overall, a statistical analysis indicates that males doing cooking is highest but house repairs is lowest. However, we can see if we look at the specific figures.
Look at the first bar chart in 2010. It can be seen that, the percentage of females and males in cooking is highest (80%) and (60%). Meanwhile, the rate of males and females in house repairs and pet care is lowest, pet care of males (20%) and females (20%) have the same number, but house repairs of males (20%), females (10%). Ranked second after cooking is cleaning, men (40%) and women (60%).
Look at the second bar chart in 2010, the average time males and females do homework for cooking is highest among four activities. Males always doing cooking lower time than females (60 minutes) and (80 minutes). Meanwhile, pet care and house repairs of men is similar (20 minutes), but females higher than 15 minutes when females of pet care ( 20 minutes) but house repairs (5 minutes). Finally, people doing cleaning is second after cooking, men is 45 minutes and females 60 minutes. So, it can be seen that the people always spent their time on cooking and cleaning than any other activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than 15 minutes when females of pet care 20 minutes but house repairs 5 minutes. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62053571429 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25597544827 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450892857143 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.401847444 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.25 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150284956852 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807609250988 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909282689721 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132093232002 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115679732513 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.