The bar chart showing the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in uk from 2001 to 2008.
This chart compares the proporation of people who were consuming the five portions of fruit and vegetables per day for the period of eight years between 2001 and 2008
Overall, the people who consumed the maximum amount of fruit and vegetables was women, followed by men. Children consumed the least portion of these foods. However, the figures mushroomed in the coming years.
The percentage of women consuming the food was 20% in 2001, this figure rose steadily from 2002(24%) to 2005 (30%). Finally this figure reached up to 35% in 2006. However, the figure slightly dropped in the next two years.
In relation of men and children , the consumption pattern was stable from 2001 to 2003 (about 12% and 17%). In 2004 proporation of children consuming portions of food reached 17% and finally increased up to the peak of 25% in 2007 and final drop in this figure was by almost 2% in 2008. The percentage of men mushroomed to 28% in 2006 and remained stable in 2007, leading to drop by 2% in 2008.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Children consumed the least portion of these foods. However, the figures mushro...
^^
Line 9, column 113, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...rose steadily from 200224% to 2005 30%. Finally this figure reached up to 35% in 2006. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 32, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...years. In relation of men and children , the consumption pattern was stable from...
^^
Line 11, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 2007, leading to drop by 2% in 2008.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42352025228 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525714285714 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 70.9508611037 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5555555556 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25497700159 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846375584966 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116186270688 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180802645591 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137770013097 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.