The bar chart shows British Emigration selected to destinations between 2004 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart compares the number of British people who migrated to Australia, Spain, New Zealand, USA and France from 2004 to 2007.
Overall, it can be seen that while Australia and Spain were the most preferred destinations, the remaining three nations remained the least popular terminals for British folks.
As regards Australia, 2004 stood at around 42,000 travellers, followed by a slight drop to approximately 39,000 tourists in 2005. Despite falling, there was a dramatic growth, rocketing to just over 50,000, the figure being the highest total of the term. However, there was a considerable slid to about 44,000 in 2007. With regard to Spain, having held unaltered at relatively 33,000 in the first two years, there was then a gradual decline to around 38,000 in 2007, slightly higher than the 2004 and 2005.
In contrast, the remaining nations experienced an opposite pattern. New Zealand beginning with around 23,000 sightseers in 2004, there was a steady fall to finish the period at 20,000. Regarding the USA, it witnessed some fluctuations from 23,000 to just below 20,000 from 2004 to 2007. As for France, having started at about 22,000 in 2004, there was a rapid swell to 33,000 in 2005, the remaining span then saw a sharp dip to 18,000, which was by far the least sum and almost three times lower than the topmost figure (50,000).
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
Can you double check Spain:
With regard to Spain, having held unaltered at relatively 33,000 in the first two years, there was then a gradual decline to around 38,000 in 2007, slightly higher than the 2004 and 2005.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 228 200
No. of Characters: 1092 1000
No. of Different Words: 133 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.886 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.789 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.406 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 81 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 48 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 30 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.8 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.216 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.7 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.388 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.622 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.057 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
With regard to Spain, having
With regard to Spain, having held unaltered at relatively 33,000 in the first two years, there was then a gradual decline to around 28,000 in 2007, slightly lower than the 2004 and 2005. Thank you.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, regarding, so, then, well, while, as for, as regards, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97807017544 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49009657403 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614035087719 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8583648026 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.7 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0750749803106 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388205003104 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041790449578 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648676072324 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516123304172 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.