The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman.
The bar chart compares four process of waste disposal in four different cities.
First of all, Landfill method compound the highest usage of terminate waste in three countries, Toronto, Madrid, and Amman. As well as, Toronto is the only one country which are prefer landfill rather than other method of garbage disposal. Percentage of Toronto's landfill disposal have already reached 70%. Amman is second city that utilize landfill procedure.
According to the chart, Compositing is the least way of all of the methods. The highest percentage of compositing is also Madrid and Toronto as its the least of others ratio. It is clear that recycling is not notable way to dispose of rubbish. Only two countries tend to keen on consume this idea which constitute just 20%. As well as, Madrid and Kuala lampur's number of using its as fertilizer and recycling style equaled in this graph
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 178, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'preferred'.
Suggestion: preferred
...ronto is the only one country which are prefer landfill rather than other method of ga...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... chart, Compositing is the least way of all of the methods. The highest percentage of comp...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...mpositing is also Madrid and Toronto as its the least of others ratio. It is clear ...
^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...adrid and Kuala lampurs number of using its as fertilizer and recycling style equal...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, well, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 735.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47420867094 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.4846614384 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.5 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349849700744 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121252583431 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127628992507 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263655044823 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149885701407 0.0819641961636 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.