the bar chart shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006.

The bar chart below illustrates the variety of digital games sold in the world during the period between 2000 and 2006. The sales of mobile phone games, online games, console games and handheld games is showed in billion dollar. It is clear that the handheld game was the most popular game in the studied period.

Looking into details, handheld games was at approximately 10 billion dollars in 2000, it had been increasing steadily over the 7 years and it reached a pick with 18 billion dollars in sales in 2006. Similarly, the income from online games had been rising constantly from 2001, sales revenues for this type of game was 10 billion dollar in 2006. The mobile phone games industry started in 2002, it had been growing since then and it had an 8 billion dollar in sales in 2006. The numbers for console games had different patterns, they gradually decreased from 6 billion in 2000 to 3 billion in 2006.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...e games and handheld games is showed in billion dollar. It is clear that the handheld g...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, similarly, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69565217391 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29800234625 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534161490683 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1896221794 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474924924269 0.215688989381 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.2263633751 0.103423049105 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691040074202 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.365376767244 0.15604864568 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225504618262 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.