The bar chart shows the number of visitors to three London Museums between 2000 and 2005.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the number of visitors to three museums in three different countries over a half-decade starting from 2000.
A glance at the charts reveals that the Edo museum in Tokyo was the most popular of three museums at the beginning of the period. However, it has decreased significantly and stood at the lowest position in 2005 while the National museum of China gained the most visitors at that time.
In 2000, 12 million visitors went to the MET museum in New York. In this year, Tokyo’s Edo Museum received the highest number of visitors, which was over 13 million, twice as many as that of the National Museum in China. After a year, the number of visitors to the Edo Museum stayed unchanged at more than 13 million, while the figure for the MET Museum decreased significantly by half compared to last year. The number of visitors to the National Museum of China this year rose slightly, by nearly 2 million. The Edo Museum got about 10 million visitors, which was slightly more than that of the National Museum in China in the following year. In 2003, the number of visitors to the Edo Museum reached its lowest level, more than 6 million. From this year to the end of this period, the Edo Museum has had the lowest number of visitors of the three museums, while the numbers of national museums in China and at the MET have witnessed steady growth. By the end of the period, on top of the list was the National Museum in China, with nearly 16 million visitors. Ranked in second place was the MET museum in New York with slightly 14 million visitors, while the Edo took the last rank with exactly 10 million visitors.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 295.0 196.424390244 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56949152542 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32381720461 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.403389830508 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 402.3 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4067232251 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184153955356 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101650799454 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607951644561 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174411240982 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660240343207 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 295.0 196.424390244 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56949152542 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32381720461 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.403389830508 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 402.3 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4067232251 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184153955356 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101650799454 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607951644561 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174411240982 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660240343207 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.