Plastics bags, plastics bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment. What damage does plastic do to the environment ? What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem.
The probability of being usage of plastics material make the environment worse day by day. As a result, environmental pollution suffers from the problems is air and soil. However, there are a number of measures that can implemented to resolve the issue of overuse the plastic good.
On the one hand, it has some bad effect which the overuse of plastic bag can do with the environment, and one of them is air pollution. When some people burn the plastic products as a method of decompose the waste, it will emit the huge amount of dioxin into the environment, which may have some diseases for many people. For example, cancer is one of the common diseases which people can suffer because of burning the plastic waste. Moreover, soil pollution can happen when many individuals bury the waste into the ground, which make it not keep the water. As a result, it may have bad impact for the growth of the plant.
However, it may have some solution which both the government and individuals to attack this problem. Firstly, the government is one of the guarantee group to solve this problem by control their tight to limit any goods product which is made of plastics. By doing this method, the overuse of this material can decrease for a particular time. Additionally, some individuals should participate with this problem by choosing an alternative material, thus, they will help with the environment matter if many people can do this trend together. For instance, there are some shops in Danang City have to buy a water bottle which is made of a first-used plastic material.
To conclude, soil and air pollution are two of the most popular kind of pollution which happen on our whole planets. Only when the government and many individuals envolve in restricting the plastics good, will this situation be remedied.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
...lem by control their tight to limit any goods product which is made of plastics. By d...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... good, will this situation be remedied.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87096774194 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64001072113 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506451612903 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3455324853 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323730312091 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114783424688 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616869138015 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204101447196 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424821112742 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.