Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem

Essay topics:

Plastic bags, plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment.
What damage does plastic do to the environment?
What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem?

Plastic pollution is a burning issue for most nations around the globe. It damages the environment in numerous ways. Hence, to mitigate this problem governments and individuals need to come together and devise appropriate steps.
Birds, animals and vegetation are greatly affected by plastic wastes. This is because, it always finds its way either in big landfills or in the water reservoirs like lakes, rivers and ocean. Due to its non-biodegradable properties, it does not decompose and is mistakenly eaten by a fish or sometimes gets stuck in a Pigeon's neck. This causes a lot of discomfort to them and may lead to their death. Moreover, if incinerated it emits harmful particles which are not only detrimental to humans, but to the flora and fauna of the surrounding. Therefore, it has become evident to reduce its usage as its disposal is altogether a different problem to deal.
People have to unite with government for effective measures. Firstly, the state officials should ban the use of single-use bottle or disposable food packets. Packaging industries and big hotels should be charged with hefty fines for using these types of containers. Secondly, at an individual level a person needs to change the routine habit of using plastics everywhere. Not only they can replace polythene with a jute bag, but also use a steel refillable water bottle which is much more environmentally friendly than packaged drinking water.
In conclusion, plastic bags, plastic bottles and plastic packaging are terrible for the environment especially for the natural beings. Further to resolve this problem society along with its administration should figure out ways to tackle this crisis.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ment especially for the natural beings. Further to resolve this problem society along w...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24444444444 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92089581689 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659259259259 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2017977676 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331721706875 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937942536519 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105205921332 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212869379354 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110384255205 0.056905535591 194% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.