Some people think that older employees contribute most to the success of a company. Others think that younger people play a more vital role. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Employees are the most vital part of a prominent organization. However, the age group of the staff is a debatable issue. Most people believe that a diverse work experience of an old employee is essential while others prefer youngsters as they are more convenient with technology. This essay will discuss both the views in detail.
It is a true that, certain practical knowledge comes only through years of work. When an individual spends most part of his life devoting to a company, he clearly is more aware of all the aspects of the job that he has performed. This makes him a subject matter expert. Consequently, it makes him wise enough to take crucial decisions that a youngster might be unsure to make. Hence, it is important for a firm to keep some of its old partners for a word of advice in the time of need.
On the other hand, senior staff becomes lethargic and prone to illness and during such circumstances an office will require the young and dynamic workforce. The young adults are filled with innovative ideas and are technologically sound. These qualities in them are necessary to complete the office tasks fast and with accuracy. For instance, trainees in our office can complete a report in much less time and with minimum errors, than the experienced ones, as they are familiar with software applications like Microsoft word, excel and others of that ilk. Because of these reasons, it is suggested to employ young adults in large proportions.
In conclusion, despite it is fruitful to employ young people compared to old persons, a specific percentage of both are required to maintain and run a business successfully, in my opinion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for a word of advice in the time of need On the other hand senior staff becomes l...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77304964539 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67747169647 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 282.0 20.2975951904 1389% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1346.0 106.682146367 1262% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 282.0 20.7667163134 1358% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 106.0 7.06120827912 1501% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153367893981 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153367893981 0.084324248473 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102444994372 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077878208679 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 142.0 13.0946893788 1084% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -206.29 50.2224549098 -411% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 112.1 11.3001002004 992% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.87 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.99 8.58950901804 256% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 9.78957915832 562% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 114.8 10.1190380762 1134% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 55.0 10.7795591182 510% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.