Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbles and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this Information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Most companies require people to add personal details in their resume while applying for job while others think that this is irrelevant. This essay will discuss both the agrument in detail and provide evidence as to why sharing information such as hobbies and interests or marital status to the employer is beneficial.
In an idea scenario a company should focus
more on professinal abilities of an employee instead of their personal interests. For any organization to achieve a skyrocketing sucess, it is mandatory to employ individuals with prominent professional skills. Without a proper working capability an employee is no longer an asset to the company. Taking an example of a person who is good at basket ball and wins all the tournaments conducted by his company, but fails to finish his monthly targets. Clearly, such executives make their bosses proud on the sports fields but lets down the company on the market.
On the contrary, some recruiters suggests that such information is helpful to understand an individual's personality. For instance, a person intrested in indoor activities is more likely to be an introvert while an extrovert would be more involved in socializing outdoors. These personality traits will allow companies to deploy the people accordingly. Proper placement will ensure a better work environment for both individuals as well as the company.
In conclusion, the advantages of fetching future employees personal interests outweighs the disadvantages. I strongly opine that collecting such data is relevant as well as useful.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... an idea scenario a company should focus more on professinal abilities of an empl...
^^^
Line 4, column 525, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...r bosses proud on the sports fields but lets down the company on the market. On t...
^^^^
Line 6, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...information is helpful to understand an individuals personality. For instance, a person int...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 429, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...r work environment for both individuals as well as the company. In conclusion, the adva...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38211382114 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03233504959 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626016260163 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5182068075 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.846153846 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260763353502 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841190352254 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594843461045 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128914656602 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102367189557 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... an idea scenario a company should focus more on professinal abilities of an empl...
^^^
Line 4, column 525, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...r bosses proud on the sports fields but lets down the company on the market. On t...
^^^^
Line 6, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...information is helpful to understand an individuals personality. For instance, a person int...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 429, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...r work environment for both individuals as well as the company. In conclusion, the adva...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38211382114 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03233504959 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626016260163 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5182068075 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.846153846 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260763353502 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841190352254 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594843461045 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128914656602 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102367189557 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.