Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages?
Exports and imports of the exotic fruits and vegetables is not a new thing these days. However, many believe that consuming local cuisines is more economical and environment friendly. I completely disagree with this view and this essay will elaborate it further.
There are certain advantages of eating foreign vegetation. Firstly, the health benefits of some vegetation is hard to ignore. For instance, fruits like Dragon fruit and avocado are difficult to produce in regions like India, yet its consumption by Indians in beneficial to their health and so its intake becomes essential part of diet. Secondly, the economy of some countries are based on these imports and exports. The shipping industries makes a great profit out of it. In addition, the rare availability of such items makes them expensive which in turn aids the farmers in earning more than farming the local crops. Lastly, today a variety of foods is a bait used to lure foodies to the hotels and restaurants. Thus, increasing income in food business.
On the other side, there are some downside to these to and fro of goods. As the demand of such food is increased, the farming is also increased to cope with the supply. As a result, a shortage of farming land and internal dispute among farmers are a common consequnces. For example, a land used for growing the superfoods like quinoa becomes barren after few crops of the plant, rendering the land unsuitable for cultivation of any other crops and converting the region into dry desserts.
In conclusion, despite some downside of the exporting of foreign food the merits certainly outweighs the demerits. However, there are some environmental drawbacks, but the outstanding economical benefits overshadows the problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'downsides'?
Suggestion: downsides
...s. On the other side, there are some downside to these to and fro of goods. As the de...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...onmental drawbacks, but the outstanding economical benefits overshadows the problem.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13684210526 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75709108419 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.694166981 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1176470588 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7647058824 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195606915059 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594247930924 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046081273203 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113283922375 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584843800299 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.