These days people's attention spans are becoming shorter due to the prevalence of social media.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, social media has infiltrated human lives deeply. This pervasiveness has lead to the reduction in attention spans of people. I do not concur with this statement and this essay with explain my opinion further in detail.
Undoubtedly, it is hard to replace the conveniences, like video calls and texting that a social media app provides. Adults are addicted to using these apps not only for contacting, but also for multiple purposes like making reels, watching videos and posting pictures. These feckless activities takes up too much time and most importantly impairs their brain functionality and thinking capabilities. A recent survey conducted in America shows an increase in the number of youngsters suffering from the Attention Deficit Syndrome where, it is hard for them to focus on one particular activity. However, this is not the only aspect critics are worried about.
Apart from using these applications reasons like overuse of the technology, in each and every field, is also declining the concentration of most individuals. When a person uses a gadget in the kitchen or heavy machinery in the factory he/she is reminded of the next step via a sensor or an alarm. These advancements conveniently obsolete the need to check-up on the on-going process consequently, decreasing their attentiveness. Similarly, utilization of tech in schools also has a major impact on a child’s brain development. Instead of writing, they type and learn lessons from online study materials rather than reading a book, which are believed to increase concentration power. Overall, these innovations are creating detrimental implications on our mental abilities.
In conclusion, intrusion of social media in our lives has definitely changed the way we used to think and definitely have affected our thinking patterns. But, in my opinion, technology as a whole is reason for short attention spans of humans today.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'take'.
Suggestion: take
...ing pictures. These feckless activities takes up too much time and most importantly i...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...ly obsolete the need to check-up on the on-going process consequently, decreasing their ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, similarly, so, apart from, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34768211921 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02300471707 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64238410596 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4428209908 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.9375 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126092624418 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398088656416 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333329978936 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782624060657 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285575125989 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.