The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three-year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams provided illustrate the result of three years survey to measure how the Londoners perceive their city.
Overall, it is evident that all respondents consider that the greatest value about the city are various shopping centres, while the traffic jam is believed as the bad experience living in the city. also, littering is considered as a principal environmental issue in london.
The first graph shows that more than 40% of the Londoners chose the range of shops as the best experience in the city, while about 30% of the all year respondents responsd that job vacancy, the mixture of people and museum & art galleries as the advantages living in london. The nightlife and transport are picked by approximately 20%-25% of the Questioned-londoners as a main attraction dwelling in the city.
The second graph illustrates that majority of all-year respondents states that living expense and traffic congestion as the bad experiences living in the city (at around 50%), while just below 60% of the first year londoner also cite that criminal activity is among the bad experience in london. However, there are just below 30% of the second and third year londoners fell that transportation as a negative side living in london.
The third paragraph shows that all respondents regard the littering activity as the main environmental issue in london and the answer of the questioned – respondents regarding the problems of air pollution and noise are slightly different.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
... the bad experience living in the city. also, littering is considered as a principal...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n attraction dwelling in the city. The second graph illustrates that majority ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, third, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2510460251 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95310277035 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514644351464 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 377.1 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.0257247549 43.030603864 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.875 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.875 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217540516996 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104661511696 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520338157625 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127484843785 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583092721694 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.