The bar charts below show the percentages of men and women in employment in three countries in 2005 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The data demonstrated the employment percentages of female and male in three countries, including Canada, South Korea, and Sweden from 2005 to 2015.
First of all, in 2005 the hightest employment rates of men in amount this three countries was Sweden which was roughly about 78 percent, while South Korea also had a very close percentage which was 75 percent. The lowest employment rate of men was Canada which was 63 precent. Meanwhile, the highest employment rates of women in these countries was Sweden, it had over 40 percent women employment rate. On the other hand, South Korea had the lowest percentage of women were hired in the data which only was 30 percent in 2005.
Secondly, Canada had the significant changed of the employment rates in each gender in 2015. The employment rate of male in cananda increased 10 percent which reached to 70 percent. As well as the employment rate of female which from 37 precent climbed up to 55 percent, thus, Canada had the highest women employment rate in these three countries. By contrast, the lowest employment rate of women was still South Korea, which was around 35 precent. Regardless, the highest employment rate of male was South Korea which was 78 precent.
- In the past most people used to travel to their place of work With increased use of computers the internet and smart phones more and more people are starting to work from home What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 56
- The table below shows how many tourists from five countries visited Australia from 1991 1999 74
- The bar chart shows the relative electricity consumption and cost per year of various household devices Write a 150 word report for a university lecturer explaining the data and making comparisons where relevant 67
- There seems to be an increasing trend towards assessing students through exams rather than continual assessment What are the advantages and disadvantages of exams as a form of assessment 73
- Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 528, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...data which only was 30 percent in 2005. Secondly, Canada had the significant cha...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90776699029 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55233190485 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45145631068 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3677410551 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.1 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 5.23603664747 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146053036053 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837903079038 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392540574536 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129786661115 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286063654036 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.