The Bar graph below shows the Expenditure in Million Pounds on fast food items by income groups in the UK.
The bar chart demonstrates the expense of three types of fast food item which were consumed by United Kingdom citizens in 1990.
Generally speaking, it is easy to see that people with high and average income spent more money on hamburger. Besides, it could be observed that fish and chip attracted the consumption of low income groups.
According to the bar graph, the people who had high income tended to use their money to hamburger with more than 45 million pounds. Otherwise, two other fast food namely Pizza, Fish and Chip that high income citizens expensed more than 15 million pounds, less than 3 times that of Hamburger.
As same as high earners, the most preferred of average income, which is Hamburger with 33 million pounds, was more than 2 times as much as Pizza. There was a quite high favorite in Fish and Chip with 25 million pound in 1990.
In the low-income group, people who different from 2 pervious groups, spend more money on Fish and Chip than Hamburger and Pizza. However, their costumes was relatively low, with 17 million pound on Fish and Chip, 14 million pound on Hamburger and only 7 million pound on Pizza.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rger and only 7 million pound on Pizza.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74874371859 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32388019944 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527638190955 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.3893318107 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224888550167 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100682200161 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535414714775 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129532668185 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523831529468 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.