: The bar graph show the global sales( in billion dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006: The bar graph show the global sales( in billion dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006
The given graph illustrates the revenue generated from four types of games, namely mobile phone, online, console and handheld games measured in billion dollars over the course 6 years starting in 2000.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the sales of handheld, online and mobile phone games witnessed a vigorous growth, as opposed to that of console games. It is also evident that out of all categories examined, handheld games remained the highest grossing sector throughout the timescale.
In 2000, the sales of handheld games stood at shy of $12 billion. This figure rose to just under $18 billion, an increase of 50% in 6 years. The sales of console games, on the other hand, nosedived from roughly $6 to a mere $3 billion within the same timespan.
It was not until 2001 did online games appear in the survey with a negligible turnover of around $1 billion. Over the next 6 years, however, this figure increased exponentially to approximately $9 billion, making it the second best-selling type of games after console games. Similarly, albeit with a later emergence in 2002, sales of mobile phone games skyrocketed from $2 to north of $6 billion in the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
... console and handheld games measured in billion dollars over the course 6 years startin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'game'.
Suggestion: game
...of 50% in 6 years. The sales of console games, on the other hand, nosedived from roug...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the other hand, nosedived from roughly to a mere billion within the same times...
^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... hand, nosedived from roughly to a mere billion within the same timespan. It wa...
^^
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vey with a negligible turnover of around billion. Over the next 6 years, however,...
^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...increased exponentially to approximately billion, making it the second best-selli...
^^
Line 4, column 193, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...creased exponentially to approximately billion, making it the second best-selling type...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of mobile phone games skyrocketed from to north of billion in the end of the p...
^^
Line 4, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hone games skyrocketed from to north of billion in the end of the period.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, second, similarly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97461928934 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62952981841 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593908629442 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.967975442 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.888888889 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249883970855 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111725320928 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628810692682 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161005384474 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370452377838 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.