CAMBRIDGE 13 TEST 1 WRITING TASK 1
The map below shows the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.
The map illustrates the infrastructure improvements that allow easier access to the city hospital in 2010 in comparison with 2007.
It is clear that the main layout of the hospital access was largely unchanged. However, the road infrastructure was significantly upgraded among which the most notable changes were the roundabouts, the bus station and the car park arrangements.
Overall the layout of the city hospital remained the same, with the main access at its South side. The junctions of the Hospital Road with Ring Road and City Road were changed from cross to roundabouts.
The bus stops that aligned the two sides of the Hospital Road were turned into a large bus station to the West side of the road, with access to the two newly constructed roundabouts.
In 2007, there was only one car park shared by staff and the public at the East side of the road. In 2010, the originally shared car park only allowed staff to park cars there, while a public car park was established to the East side of the hospital.
Comments
CAN YOU PLZ GIVE THE…
CAN YOU PLZ GIVE THE EVALUATION OF MY WRITING TASK ON THE SAME TOPIC AND PROVIDE BANDS.
The two maps manifest a comparison on the road access to a city hospital in the respective years of 2007 and 2010.
Overall, we observe a proper and systematic arrangement and maintenance of the road access to the city hospital in 2010 as compared to 2007, which didn’t have many facilities then.
To begin with, in 2007 there were many small bus stops that would facilitate travel. Although there were many instances of bus stops, there a lot of time is consumed to travel from one bus stop to another. In contrast, there is a creation of a whole bus station in the year 2010, which alleviated the need to travel from one stop to another. Secondly, there is no categorization for public and staff parking, which is ameliorated in the year 2010. Thirdly, there is an amalgamation of traffic near the city road, which is a result of no provision of any roundabouts. However, in the year 2010, there is a creation of divider, which proscribed the accumulation of traffic.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82485875706 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67382692822 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0104894996 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21345045299 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115809546703 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775542470558 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143996543423 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084908313205 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.