The pie chart illustrates the causes of worldwide land degradation, which led to less fertile land; whereas, the table represents affected regions due to such causes: deforestation, over-cultivation, over-grazing, and others in the year 1990.
As the charts outline, overgrazing and cutting down trees were the significant factors to develop soil depletion, which led the European continent more affected area.
Concerning to first chat, more than a third of the land was degraded globally by extremely grazing of animals (35%), which was closely followed by chopping down trees (30%). 28% of land did degradation due to over-harvesting, whereas an insignificant proportion, 7%, by others.
Regarding regions which were affected, the majority of the land was degraded in Europe (23%) including notable causing factors from deforestation (9.8%), which was 2.1% higher than that of over-harvesting and 4.3% of overgrazing. At the same time, the second most affected place was Oceania with a total figure of 13%, which substantially caused by overgrazing (11.3%). However, nothing was affected by over-agriculture. The rest of the area, North America, minimum land (0.2%) soil deteriorated by deforestation, but overharvesting developed more soil erosion (3.3%) and overall five percent of the land degraded in this region.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61306532663 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31677325478 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638190954774 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.049979184 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.625 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30457512569 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121120010296 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844715794812 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16456847662 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963097865519 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.