the changes of two maps
The two maps illustrate the significantly changes at a region experimented over two decades from 1995 to now.
It is clear that there is a tourism development in this area by the buildings and changes of accommodations and activities on the sea.
As can been seen, at the bottom of the two map, there is a sea where could catch fishes in the morning in 1995 by boats but it now has been replaced by a lot of yachts. Entering to the coastal land, there was a fish market that has been demolished to make way for many apartments and there was a café that has not changed except expanding the road that enters the fish market to get into it. Going deep towards the mainland, at the left-hand of the map, there were housings and sport houses but currently they were converted into numerous housings (with 6 housings added) and three restaurants respectedly as well as at the right-hand of the map there were a large land where used to construct a public park and hotels. Over the long time holiday homes have been erected in place of the park and the hotels has been extended and in particularly there has been a building of a new parking lot.
At the other view, on the top right-hand corner of the map, a foretime farmland has been transformed into two sporty courses are tennis and golf.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[4]
Message: Did you mean 'can be' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: can be; has been
...dations and activities on the sea. As can been seen, at the bottom of the two map, the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 2, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sporty courses are tennis and golf.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, well, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51271186441 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54122502336 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550847457627 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.0047211252 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.142857143 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.7142857143 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291326924752 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146497594569 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137139900818 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220651259183 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137638810169 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.47 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.