The graphs illustrate about the number of people in Japan from 1950 to 2055. It is cogent from the table that the number of people, who is 65 years old or above, increased since 1950.
Overall, the unit of population is measured in millions. Although the number of people in Japan fluctuated during 105-year span, between 1950 to 2055, the count of older people, age 65 and above rose significantely.
In 1950 the total number of Japanees people was 84.1 millions, which was the lowest count of population but it went up dramatically and reached to its apogee, 127.8 millions in 2005. Aditionally, as per the projection this number will be dropped drastically in 2055 and reach to 89.9 millions. From 1970 to 1975, this number experienced the highest increase of 7.4 millions (104.5 millions and 111.9 millions respectively). However, as per the expectation the population will decreased to its maximum level during 2035 and 2055. (From 110 milions to 89.9 millions)
Conversely, the lowest percentage of 65 years old and above people was in the year 1950, which was 4.9%. After that it rocketed to 20.0% in the year 2005. According to the future projection, this percentage will be increased to 41 in 2055. Despite of that, as per the expectation the old age population will be dropped slightly from 2035 and 2055(37.2 and 36.5 respectively).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... number experienced the highest increase of 7.4 millions 104.5 millions and 111.9...
^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'decrease'
Suggestion: decrease
...per the expectation the population will decreased to its maximum level during 2035 and 20...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e was in the year 1950, which was 4.9%. After that it rocketed to 20.0% in the year 2...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93392070485 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74125646154 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484581497797 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5345263656 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0763876019528 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356306161619 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378772275676 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0589625381516 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338086112729 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.