The gathered information in the table is about life expectancy in 3 countries and the amount of money each country spends on health care system. On the other hand, the chart furnishes data about the number of hospital beds per thousand of folks in some developed countries.
According to the table Japan has the most range of life expectancy among mentioned countries in the table. However, this asian country has spent less dollars for each person. In contrary, the US has the fewer life expectancy, by spending about 3 times more than Japan on health system.
On the other, the chart enlights about the reasons of Japan's high rate of life expectancy. While the US has less than 4 beds in a hospital per 1000 citizens, Japan offorded 14 beds for each 1000 Japanese.
Obviously, the rate of the life expectancy is more related to the money each government has spent on building hospitals than any other spending mechanism. For instance, the Netherlands provided more than 4 beds per thousand of population and reached to the number of 80 in the average life expectancy, while the US beds in hospitals is below than 4 per 1000 which causes to less life expectancy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: LESS_DOLLARSMINUTESHOURS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer dollars'?
Suggestion: fewer dollars
.... However, this asian country has spent less dollars for each person. In contrary, the US ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun dollars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
.... However, this asian country has spent less dollars for each person. In contrary, t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77722772277 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58530094996 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465346534653 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7546789102 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238781113781 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119544408916 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950981237617 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168527514911 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855774059113 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.