The bar graph below show the variation in population of Japanese over a period of 105 years between 1950 and 2055 and the table gives the proportion of citizens aged above 65 in four different years.
At the first glance, it is clear, Japan population is increased gradually from 1950 to 2005. Population count has reached peak in 2005 with 127.8 million. However, in 2010 there is a slight decline of 0.7 million which is approximately a million. In 2015, it is observed that there is fall in inhabitant' s count to 125.4 million. Moreover, it is predicted that similar trend of declining will be followed to next four decades to reach a population count of 89.9 million which is almost 6 million greater than 1950.
Another point to consider is from table it is seen that there is a rise in senior citizen count from 1950 to 2005 with a count of 25.7 million which is almost 20% of that year total population. As a result of increased aged people count it is anticipated to have a growth of eight times of old people population in 1950 that is 36.5 million in 2055, which shares 41 per cent of total population of that year.
Overall, Japanese population may increase or decrease but there is a constant growth in aged people over 65. This shows that Japan environment is more suitable for old people. Additionally, they took an initiative to reduce population for next three decades in order to avail facilities for a limited number of population.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67704280156 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61980133242 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533073929961 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2389250708 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.272727273 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141437316127 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568610152124 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450373470162 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947382428266 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396657757187 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.