The chart and the table show the rates of cell phone ownership for three groups: students at Jenny school, parents of those students and nationwide.

Essay topics:

The chart and the table show the rates of cell phone ownership for three groups: students at Jenny school, parents of those students and nationwide.

The chart and the table show the rates of cell phone ownership for three groups: students at Jenny school, parents of those students and nationwide.

The students are the most interesting group. Trought 2002-2016 the ownership of cellphone had abruptly increased. In the beggining of the period the cell phones almost non exist, by 2010 the rates was 20%, but between 2012 and 2016, it jump up 50 points of percentage.

Another group with a improvement in his cell phone ownership is the natiowide. In 2002 the 60% of population had their own devices, for the 2010 this grow up to a 85% , and for the 2016, almost all the populations had one. The flunctuation in those 14 years reached 36%.

However, the group which increase slowly was the parents. From 2002 to 2016 the variation was 30%. Nevertheless, this group begun with a 50% of ownership, being in the top of the chart for 2002. The use for 2016 was an 80%.

Overall, the cell phone ownership have increased over the years, showing a masification on the use of technology. Actually, each person in the nation have a cellphone.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'jumps'?
Suggestion: jumps
... was 20%, but between 2012 and 2016, it jump up 50 points of percentage. Another...
^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s of percentage. Another group with a improvement in his cell phone ownership...
^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n devices, for the 2010 this grow up to a 85% , and for the 2016, almost all the ...
^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ices, for the 2010 this grow up to a 85% , and for the 2016, almost all the popula...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, nevertheless, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76842105263 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65747939972 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584210526316 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4424427519 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.6923076923 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6153846154 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414064863663 0.215688989381 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13739578945 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.253851912967 0.0843802449381 301% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288263321395 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.356494579711 0.0819641961636 435% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.79 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.