The graphic presents the number of UK people eating five fruit and vegetable servings each day over an 8 year period, from 2001 to 2008. It is noticed that the percentage of women is much greater than the percentage of men and children.
There was an approximate 2% increase every year in the number of UK women from 2001 to 2006 in which this group reached the highest peak of almost 35%. In contrast, both men and children groups stayed the same at 17% and 12% respectively during 2001 until 2003 and then they all experienced quite a rise of 10% for the men group and almost double for the children group between 2003 and 2006.
The last 2 year period from 2006 to 2008 was a slow fall to all 3 groups. Particularly, the women group dropped down to 30% in 2008 whereas the men group fell to 27% and the children group went up to around 26% in 2006 and then down to 24% in the last year.
- People are wasting a lot of food these days What causes it and what solutions are possible 59
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The bar chart shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 69
- Many parents believe that when their children read books for entertainment, they are wasting their time, and that they should read only serious, educational books. What is your opinion about this? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 726.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.27058823529 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22222183775 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570588235294 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 189.9 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.5618914628 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170698263799 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104998610549 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107671687211 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147870286204 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128926159143 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 85.36 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.78 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.