The bar chart illustrates the portion of fruits and vegetables consumed by men, women and children each day, in Europe between 2001 and 2008.
Overall, women consumed more compared to men and kids. The kids showed a gradual growth till certain period, but faced a drop in the end. Although, there is a decline at the end stage, girls remained at the peak.
In 2001, the top portion is occupied by women with almost 23% and former to them are gents with approximately 17.5%. However, babies remained last with around 12.5%. While, in 2002 and 2003 faced a rapid growth totally the ranks remained same, with females at top followed by male and kids. In 2004, the rates rose rapidly in all categories. Similarly, to the previous years the places remained same on the table with 30% for ladies, 22% for boys and nearly 20% for kids. In 2005, the rates got increased just a bit compared to past for women, male and kids with nearly 33%, 26% and 18% respectively.
The years 2006, 2007 and 2008 have same ranks with respect to others. In 2006, percentages for girls, gents and youths are approximately 36%, 24% and 22%. However, after 2006. rates reduced but places stayed same. In 2007 and 2008, women are at 32% and 31%, men at 28% and 24%, children at 25% and 22% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Rates
... 36%, 24% and 22%. However, after 2006. rates reduced but places stayed same. In 2007...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, similarly, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61403508772 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3241475964 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570175438596 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6136586536 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.1333333333 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13333333333 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0966012119021 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032396050514 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673781930274 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909930697057 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104972455323 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.