On the planet there are numerous countries and a number of have high standard of living and many more don't. Those well settled nations offer help to others who can't afford this. However, it is frequently argued by many that receiving aid from other nations is not accurate and leads to problems. This essay delves all the aspects on this issue in the following paragraphs.
On one hand, with the rapid rise in human strength the crops and many more resources won't be abundance for all. In contradiction to this various citizens suffer and some times lose there life. To overcome this there should be proper help from others. For instance, as Africa is not economically strong they couldn't afford education for all. This brings the drop in literacy rate and indirectly effects the nations GDP(Gross Domestic Product). But, with the kind heart from Europe and other individuals throughout the planet funds are being rising which helped in constructing schools. Therefore, getting help is a benefit.
On the other hand, by giving free food and medicines there will not be good relationships between nations. Sometimes the receiving people they are being looked down. It also give becomes risk for giving government also. Because, the people in there province don't like giving. Sometimes if the affording community gets effected ecomically there can be a chance of getting blame for distributing without taking money. By considering these some are not helping even if they have more than that could go into stomach These are some issues faced by both of them.
To conclude, by helping others it can have negative opinion on both sides. But, in comparison to optimistic side the disadvantages can be shaken off.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e high standard of living and many more dont. Those well settled nations offer help ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ettled nations offer help to others who cant afford this. However, it is frequently ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... Africa is not economically strong they couldnt afford education for all. This brings t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gives'?
Suggestion: gives
...ple they are being looked down. It also give becomes risk for giving government also...
^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...give becomes risk for giving government also. Because, the people in there province ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ecomes risk for giving government also. Because, the people in there province dont like...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
.... Because, the people in there province dont like giving. Sometimes if the affording...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03521126761 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53287255195 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609154929577 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8874285268 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.2631578947 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9473684211 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31578947368 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293699707194 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754460838521 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526661368452 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154522074853 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645508817457 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.36 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.