the chart bellow shows the total number of minutes of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The bar chart compares the total number of minutes of UK's telephone calls, which categorized in three separate groups over a period of 7 years.
It is clear that local_fix line overtook the other two every year. The national and international- fix line and mobiles had risen during the years 1995-2002.
the local- fix line used for 70 billions minutes in year 1995 and grew up to 90 billions minutes till year 1998 and it was stable for two years. the mobiles and national and international- fix line had increase progress from 5 billions minutes and 38 billions minutes to 12 billions and 50 billions from year 1995 till year 19999, respectively.
The local- fix line had decrease from 90 billions to 70 billions during years 19999-2002, while other two groups had increase. The mobile and national and international- fix line grew up to 45 billions and 62 billions minutes till the year 2002, respectively. But the local- fix line was the head anyway over whole period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... had risen during the years 1995-2002. the local- fix line used for 70 billions mi...
^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...r 1998 and it was stable for two years. the mobiles and national and international-...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84431137725 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66701773778 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479041916168 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8740889116 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.125 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149693939501 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081582160824 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800819271291 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122764059854 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883720564927 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.52 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.