The chart below compares the responses of undergraduates and postgraduates to a questionnaire on their opinion about their university library.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the proportions of student’s responses to a questionnaire about the range of books and non-printed material in their university library.
Overall, most postgraduates responded that the range of books was lousy, the undergraduates were divided in their responses. The availability of non-printed materials such as computer software, online journals etc. was brilliant for undergraduates but half the postgraduates felt the library’s non-printed material was just satisfactory.
Most undergrads responded that the range of books available were impressive or satisfactory, 39% and 29% accordingly. Only 32% of them were not happy with the range of books. 55% of them also answered that the non-printed materials at the university library was fantastic, followed by 33% being satisfied and only 12% of the students were not happy of the non-printed collection at the library.
The responses given by postgraduates on the range is books was steep at 65% indicating that materials were not good at all. Only a mere 15% of postgrads felt that the collection was great and the rest of 20% were just satisfied. On the non-printed material, nearly half of them were just satisfied and the other half were divided on their responses; 25% were not okay and 27% of them found it to be very good.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24644549763 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1956907037 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497630331754 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3846820423 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.7 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110930606129 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055094153566 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669209387182 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999261521657 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740881486301 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.