The chart below compares the responses of undergraduates and postgraduates to a questionnaire on their opinion about their university library. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the proportions of students’ responses to a questionnaire on the “range of books” and “non-printed material” in their university library. The responses were graded as very good, satisfactory, and not good for undergraduates and postgraduates.
Overall, most postgraduates responded that the range of books was not good, the undergraduates were divided in their response. The availability of non-printed materials such as computer software, online journals etc. was brilliant for undergraduates but half the postgraduates felt the library’s non-printed material was just satisfactory.
Most undergrads responded that the range of books available were impressive or satisfactory, 39% and 29% respectively. Only 32% of them were not happy with the range of books. 55% also answered that the non-printed materials at the university library was fantastic, followed by 33% being satisfied and only 12% of the students were unhappy with the non-printed collection at the library.
The responses given by postgraduates on the range of books was a whopping 65% indicating that materials were not good at all. Only a mere 15% of postgrads felt that the collection was great and the remaining 20% were just satisfied. On the non-printed material, nearly half of them were satisfied and the other half were divided on their responses; 25% were not okay and 27% of them found it to be very good.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d for undergraduates and postgraduates. Overall, most postgraduates responded th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42342342342 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36695968176 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495495495495 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5789600322 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.454545455 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110467865282 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536326090591 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573252164073 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914319921127 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597734029836 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.