The chart below give information on the amount of various fruits which were consumed in south America country between 1969 to and the present.
The line chart provides data about the consumption of various fruits in south America nation over a 51 years period starting in 1969. The data is in kilogram per person year kg/p/y.
Overall, it can be seen that the amount of apples, oranges and pears which were decreased ,whereas consumption of bananas increased over the period shown.
Looking at the apples line in more detail, it is evident that the consumption of apples which were declined stood at 7.2 kilogram per person year kg/p/y in 1969. This line grew to 8.6 kilogram per person year kg/p/y in 1979 which was the highest value on the chart. By 2020 it had dropped steadily to 4.2 kilogram per person year kg/p/y.
Turning to the bananas data set, it can clearly be seen that the consumption of bananas grew from 5 kilogram per person year kg/p/y in 1969 to 8 kilogram per person year kg/p/y in 2020. In contrast, 5 kilogram per person year kg/p/y of oranges was consumed at the beginning of the period. This line declined to 4 kilogram per person year kg/p/y in 1979, and then increased to 4.3 in 1999, after this line fell rapidly to 3 kilogram per person year kg/p/y in 2020.
Finally, The pears consumption stood at 3 kilogram per person year kg/p/y in 1969. This line decreased steadily to 2.2 kilogram per person year kg/p/y at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., oranges and pears which were decreased ,whereas consumption of bananas increased...
^^
Line 10, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the consumption of bananas grew from 5 kilogram per person year kg/p/y in 1969 ...
^^
Line 10, column 102, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilogram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilograms'.
Suggestion: kilograms
...the consumption of bananas grew from 5 kilogram per person year kg/p/y in 1969 to 8 kil...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 147, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilogram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilograms'.
Suggestion: kilograms
...ram per person year kg/p/y in 1969 to 8 kilogram per person year kg/p/y in 2020. In cont...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rson year kg/p/y in 2020. In contrast, 5 kilogram per person year kg/p/y of orang...
^^
Line 10, column 204, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilogram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilograms'.
Suggestion: kilograms
...on year kg/p/y in 2020. In contrast, 5 kilogram per person year kg/p/y of oranges was c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g of the period. This line declined to 4 kilogram per person year kg/p/y in 1979,...
^^
Line 10, column 317, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilogram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilograms'.
Suggestion: kilograms
...of the period. This line declined to 4 kilogram per person year kg/p/y in 1979, and the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 427, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilogram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilograms'.
Suggestion: kilograms
...1999, after this line fell rapidly to 3 kilogram per person year kg/p/y in 2020. Fi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pears'' or 'pear's'?
Suggestion: pears'; pear's
... year kg/p/y in 2020. Finally, The pears consumption stood at 3 kilogram per per...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 43, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilogram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilograms'.
Suggestion: kilograms
...nally, The pears consumption stood at 3 kilogram per person year kg/p/y in 1969. This li...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...969. This line decreased steadily to 2.2 kilogram per person year kg/p/y at the e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, look, so, then, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67796610169 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30293394174 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.402542372881 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4887655294 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.363636364 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.087089552432 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525607475932 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642571349089 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077714239067 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559314758535 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.