The chart below gives attendance figures for Grandville Stadium from 2017, which are projected through 2030 after a major improvement project.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart in question is representative of the attendance numbers of Grandville Stadium in 2017 and the projected attendance number in the years 2020 and 2030, after a major improvement project in 2019.
The chart indicates three types of events namely , Theater , Sporting Events and Concerts. In 2017, there is a very little footfall for the theater and concerts as compared to sporting events. From the chart it is fairly evident that after renovation since 2017 , attendance numbers have grown. In case of theater events , it is obvious that from the year 2020 to 2030 the number of attendees have grown more as compared to the 2017-2020 time period, to nearly 50000. For the sporting events which was the biggest crowd-puller in 2017 and will remain so as per 2030 projections , it has seen a meager rise over 150000 from 2017 to 2030. It recorded the lowest rise in attendance figures in decade after the renovation. In terms of percentage of rise of attendees in the 2020-2030 time period , the maximum rise was observed was observed for the concert events where the attendance numbers shot up three times from nearly 40000 to over 100000, touching 120000.
So in conclusion it can be summarised that after a major improvement , there has been increase in footfall overall , resulting in greater rise in attendance for concerts and theaters
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t indicates three types of events namely , Theater , Sporting Events and Concerts....
^^
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s three types of events namely , Theater , Sporting Events and Concerts. In 2017, ...
^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...evident that after renovation since 2017 , attendance numbers have grown. In case ...
^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rs have grown. In case of theater events , it is obvious that from the year 2020 t...
^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...the number of attendees have grown more as compared to the 2017-2020 time period, ...
^^
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d will remain so as per 2030 projections , it has seen a meager rise over 150000 f...
^^
Line 3, column 792, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f attendees in the 2020-2030 time period , the maximum rise was observed was obser...
^^
Line 3, column 812, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'was observed'.
Suggestion: was observed
...020-2030 time period , the maximum rise was observed was observed for the concert events where the attend...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ummarised that after a major improvement , there has been increase in footfall ove...
^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...re has been increase in footfall overall , resulting in greater rise in attendance...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99111111111 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68551579095 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493333333333 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5207355686 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.777777778 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285447185621 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129805646324 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092710432435 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223640629439 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971841569889 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.