The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future.
The illustration provides data on how municipality population developed and will develop in the future in some areas of the world.
It is clear that there was an increase in urban population on over the world from 1950 to 2000. Furthermore, there are more and more people living in metropolis in the future, particularly 2030.
The percentage of urban population of whole world accounted for 30% in 1950 and those went up to nearly a half in 2000, after which it will be predicted that the rate of municipality population of whole world in 2030 will twice bigger than those in 1950, 60% and 30%. In addition to, Latin America had and will have the biggest number of population living in towns and cities, particularly 40% in 1950, 70% in 2000 and 80% in 2030.
In 1950, Africa had the lowest percentage in municipality population with 10%. However, in 2000, the proportion of urban population in African stayed the same level with those in Asia, about under 40%. In 2030, according to the prediction, the figure of population who will living in metropolis will reach a peak in Latin America with 80% and those will twice higher than those in Africa, just 40%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72906403941 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64171718927 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512315270936 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8917173718 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152715367774 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760844771941 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523308004183 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103208757646 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140178324547 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.