Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings. Some people find it is positive while others think it is a negative development. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In the modern world, people have to deal with a host of issues, including technology. There is a widely held belief that computers will be smarter than humans. Some people think this development brings about advantages, but others argue that it is a dangerous trend. Although each side of opinion has pros and cons, which will be included in a further discussion below, I still believe it would be a combination of positive and negative trends.
On the one hand, the idea that computers create positive development can be plausible. This is because these days many applications of computers can be used to reduce people's heavy workload. For example, Word may make it easier for most clerical officers to correct mistakes when preparing business agreements or contracts. Furthermore, people can use Excel to calculate quickly and correctly. Therefore, if people use computers, they will save time and boost their productivity.
On the other hand, many people think computers lead to a harmful matter. In other words, computers will be smarter than humans, so employers can use computers to cut the labour force in some factories or companies. To illustrate, in some companies in Vietnam, an officer who uses a computer can complete manual clerical work of three people simultaneously. This makes some clerical officers lose their jobs.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the modernity of computers consists of advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, people should apply technology to promote labour productivity, but they also need to make predictions for potential jobs to avoid losing jobs due to the development of computers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27203065134 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94118144443 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2085024793 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285469953329 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974406455878 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623120408408 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173338315914 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083081824241 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.