The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018
The given bar chart depicts the weekly income metrics by the families residing in a country for the years 1968 and 2018. This is represented in terms of percentage.
Overall, the major spending is observed in food back in 1968, while this trend has changed after 5 decades.
In the year 2018, people spent more than 20 percent of their money on leisure activities, thus making it to the top. Additionally, the food which occupied about 35% of the total expenditure in 1968 has fallen to 17% later. Likewise, the expenses on fuel and power has also seen a dip by a factor of approximately 4%. While the housing has seen a rise from 10% to a good 18%. Surprisingly, the funds for household goods have remained stagnant.
The transport, personal and household goods all stand at same nearly 8% in 1968. Although, in 2018 there is a decline in pay out for personal goods, on the other hand there is increase in transport reaching nearly 14%. The share of amount of spent on clothing and footwear has halved from 1968 to 2018. Moreover, the spending has almost tripled on leisure activities going from 8 to 23 percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... a dip by a factor of approximately 4%. While the housing has seen a rise from 10% to...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, likewise, moreover, so, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67171717172 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5771485648 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631313131313 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2280331367 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0833333333 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215722836793 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651076915237 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907161817737 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126172058293 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884278732667 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.