The chart below gives information about Istanbul Promo plus sales 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The line graph illustrates the changes in “Istanbul Promo plus” sale during the year 2007.
Overall, the value of “Istanbul Promo plus” remained unchanged in the year 2007. However, it saw a fluctuation throughout the given year.
At the beginning of 2007, “Istanbul Promo plus” sales witnessed a modest rise by 50 million turkish lira, from 200 million in January to 250 million in February. This value grew rapidly in the following month and peaked at 350 million turkish lira.
However, this growing trend didn’t last long. After peaking in March the “Istanbul Promo plus” sales value saw a dramatic fall until July when it hit a low of above 100 million turkish lira. After that, the sales recovered by nearly 100 million tur lira to 200 million but in the following month, it dropped again, to the same level of July. During the last months of the year, “Istanbul Promo plus” sales climbed gradually until it reached 200 million turkish lira, the same level of January.
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- The chart below gives information about Istanbul Promo plus sales 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the process of canning of fish Write a report for a university lecturer describing the process below 40
- Water cycle 61
- Carbon cycle
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05988023952 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44412624318 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526946107784 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7969653937 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8888888889 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152065855518 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800661518926 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720184887236 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123887998984 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434394177049 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.