The chart below gives information about the percentage of the adults who were overweight in four different countries in 1980, 1990 and 2000. (Figures are given for the year, or the nearest year available.)
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and, make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the information about the proportion in terms of young people in four various regions such as Japan, Finland, Australia and USA who were enduring from obesity in two decades during 1980 and 2000.
In overall, the America constituted a major for fat youngsters whilst obese adults were found in least amount in Japan. However, there were lots of transformation can be noticed in the percentage of overweight young ones in all the nations over the periods.
With regards to the bar graph, between 1980 and 2000, the USA was most popular for overweight adults which accounted from three in ten to 15% followed by Australia. Likewise, Australia accounted for approximately at one in ten for obese youngsters from 1980 to 1990 and experienced a little more than a two fold rise to nearly a quarter in the next upcoming ten years.
The chart further proves that the percentage of fat young people in Finland was found 10%, 7% and 5% respectively during 2000, 1990 and 1980. Lastly, Japanese adults who having excessive weight remained relatively constant at around 3% within given thirty years periods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the least'.
Suggestion: in the least
...ungsters whilst obese adults were found in least amount in Japan. However, there were lo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, lastly, likewise, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00531914894 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66942855315 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627659574468 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2018152662 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.428571429 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253200878491 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106630729769 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321379823782 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142645150645 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349162682057 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.