The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
<p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0px; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 15px; white-space: normal;">The bar chart illustrates the percentage of people who hold a science qualification in Singapore and Malaysia. A prominent feature is that a significantly low percentage of people hold science qualifications, that is Master’s and Bachelor’s degrees in science from university level studies in both countries. Less than 5% of people hold a qualification in science at Master’s degree level in both Singapore and Malaysia.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0px; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 15px; white-space: normal;">There is a significant difference in the percentage of people holding science qualifications at Bachelor level between the two countries; while this number is 20% in Singapore, in Malaysia it is a mere 10%. The percentage of people with school leaving exams in science is slightly higher in Malaysia than in Singapore. 35% of people in Malaysia have a science qualification at this level, whereas the number in Singapore is 5% lower. Finally, more than half the people in both countries hold no science qualification at all.</p>
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.20111731844 4.92477711251 126% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.28516748114 2.65546596893 161% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491620111732 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 136.333740831 43.030603864 317% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 185.0 112.824112599 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130604627233 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086127556288 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0144987741326 0.0843802449381 17% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130604627233 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.7 13.2329268293 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 61.2550243902 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.3012195122 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.27 11.4140731707 169% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 23.0 11.4329268293 201% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 23.0 11.0658536585 208% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.