The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinions.
Due to the birth of cutting edge pieces of technology, the inequality between socio-economic strata has been increasingly serious. However, some believe that these inventions actually benefit people of low-income community. This essay will discuss both views and also provide my personal viewpoint about this topic.
On the one hand, according to many people, the easy availability to modern technology has gives poor people access to certain developments which used to be considered as privilege of the upper class. For example, thanks to the invention of the internet, user can learn about faraway cultures without leaving their accommodation. In the past, aristocrats had to travel to numerous region, which was unaffordable to any commoner. Additionally, in Vietnam, possession of electric devices such as television or refrigerator, which is a convention in the contemporary society, was the sight of wealth and prosperity in the last century. In light of these present availability, it is clear that some technological innovations no longer belong to merely the top class of a society.
On the other hand, however, while some inventions have become common, a wide range of newly invented technologies are giving rich citizens unfair advantages. Life expectancy of high-income people is outnumbering that of low-income group, on account of exceptional invention in medical field. Since remedies for certain incurable illnesses like cancer usually cost an arm and a leg, poor people often have to surrender before the sickness. Moreover, in metropolitan cities, in which the income gap between strata is usually the largest, there is a significant difference between living environment of the poor and the rich. While low-income community frequently lives in squalor, poor condition and exposes to hazardous chemical, people of the upper class always inhale fresh air, live in well-constructed accommodation which sometimes surrounded by artificially-made natural settings.
In my opinion, in the light of inequality listed above, technology actually widens the gap between socio-economic classes, and therefore aggravates inequality we are dealing with. In the long term, this would harm the fabric of the society.
To summarise, although easier availability to technology indeed benefits poor people, it even provides wealthy people with more advantages. However, innovation is essential for the society so it requires more consideration to determine whether it is negative or positive.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2131.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66755319149 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19266711425 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614361702128 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 692.1 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.76152304609 294% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6112428931 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.352941176 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1176470588 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243809532179 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610387249659 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540889497828 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111156545425 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372844123662 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.