The chart below gives information about southland's main exports in 2000, 20*..,and future projections for 2025.(20*..:for test purposes, use and refer to the current year)

The graph shows data about the main amount of southland`s exports in 2000, 2020 and the expectation in 2015. Overall, the international tourism is expected to be the largest in 2015, while the dairy products have reached the peak in 2020. Moreover, the meat products take the highest percentage of exports in 2000.

In detail, the lowest international tourism exports is 8 billion in 2000 compared to 9 billion in 2020. However, the exports will be expected to rise in 2025 to get to 10 billion. In addition, the meat products shows declining in the period given. It started in 2000 with 6 billion exports then 5.5 billion in 2020 ending in dramatically dropping in the future prediction to 5 billion.

Looking clearly at the diary products information, in 2020 is the highest amount of exports between the three products during the time given which is 10 billion. While the future projection will be slightly less in only half a billion, which is, Compared to 7 billion in 2000.

Votes
Average: 9.1 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... highest percentage of exports in 2000. In detail, the lowest international tour...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, moreover, so, then, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87573964497 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78554341683 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520710059172 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8804201137 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5555555556 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119087297178 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614974217204 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542619272349 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894978642786 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272353240221 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.