Food and health play a big role in people`s life. It is not possible to be healthy without watching the quality and controlling the quantity of the food we are consuming. Unfortunately, fast food options have become more convenient for most people due to their busy lifestyle. I believe that the government should apply a higher tax rate on fast food to discourage people from buying it and replace it with healthier options.
Nowadays, people are more conscious about their diets, workout and their daily routine. Everyone is trying to eat healthy as much as possible but it is harder due to their busy life and the expensive of freshly produced meals. People tend to choose fast food. For example, in Australia to eat a healthy fresh and organic breakfast will coast about $20 compared to big becan and eggs sandwich from a fast food restaurant will cost $5 or less. In this case people with low incomes will prefer to grab their meal from fast food places especially if they have big families to feed. Furthermore Fast food places are available in every suburb which makes it easier to get and quicker to eat.
However, if the government imposes a higher tax rate on fast food, this might reduce the number of people consuming it, which in turn will reduce the number of people who are suffering from health problems. In addition, the government will spend less money on health care services for people with diet-related health issues. Such as diabetes and obesity.
In the finale analysis, I believe that adopting a healthy lifestyle should come from the person it`s self, but it will be easier with the government help. By imposing a high tax for fast food and less tax rate on freshly produced food. This will encourage people to be healthier and also will increase benefits from the agriculture industry in the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and replace it with healthier options. Nowadays, people are more conscious abou...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to fast'
Suggestion: to fast
...y produced meals. People tend to choose fast food. For example, in Australia to eat ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch from a fast food restaurant will cost or less. In this case people with low in...
^^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ally if they have big families to feed. Furthermore Fast food places are available in every...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st food, this might reduce the number of people consuming it, which in turn will ...
^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to be healthier and also will increase benefits from the agriculture industry i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84444444444 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51041468881 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7428005044 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.375 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326462546787 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11886700938 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785684740656 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225939879588 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034843281017 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.