There table chart illustrates Southland's main exports in 2000, *20.., and prediction projections for 2025. The data is measured in billion pounds sterling and the goods are categorised as international tourism, dairy products, and meat products.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that the exports are predominantly with international tourism and dairy products. The least amount of is spent on meat products.
Beginning with the first category, international tourism, it predicted that it will be steadily increasing throughout the periods, with slight more than £8 billion, almost £9 billion, and nearly £10 billion in respectively. However, meat products will be reduced in the future from £6 billion to £5 billion.
The remaining category, meat products, show a different process. At first, it will be significantly increased and almost hit £10 billion, about £3 billion apart from the previous year, But in 2025, it predicted that it will be decreased in to £5 billion sharp.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...tes Southlands main exports in 2000, *20.., and prediction projections for 2025. T...
^^
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...tions for 2025. The data is measured in billion pounds sterling and the goods are categ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46753246753 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9614661346 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61038961039 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.8366382452 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.25 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0833483204016 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525618911468 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106077014684 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651097342295 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755476535244 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.