The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

There are two maps depicted an access to approach city hospital in two different periods (2007 and 2010). The major difference that can be seen is there are several facilities added and replaced. For example, in 2007, the car park between staff and public is merged as one, but years later it has been separated into different location. Staff car park still at the same position as before, but the public car park is moved to the east of the city hospital.
Most importantly, two roundabout was built both at each end of the hospital road that connected city road, ring road, and bus station. However, the bus stop in previous period is replaced by bus station, which is located in south-western of the city hospital. Things that still remained the same are the city hospital and the ring road.
To conclude, considerable differences can be noticed as many facilities and roundabout are built to improve the access to the city hospital through the two periods.
(166 words) (77 C)

Votes
Average: 9.1 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
There are two maps depicted an access to approach city hospital in two differ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79411764706 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54425195157 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570588235294 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4326763155 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5555555556 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216300197263 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914384244282 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981579636045 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14223753707 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148017229588 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.