the chart below gives information about Soutland's main exports in 2000, 20.., and future projections for 2025.
The bar chart clearly illustrates the major exports of Southland including International tourism, Dairy products and meat products in 2000. 2017 and future plans for 2025. As it can be observed at the first glance that international tourism has been raised dramatically, although, meat products have been decreased consistently from 2000 to 2025.
It is obviously evident that international tourism was the main export in 2000 and probably it will be in 2050 respectively 8.1 billion and almost 10 billion in comparison with dairy products (7 billion in 2000 and 9.5 billion in 2050) and meat products (6 billion 2000 and 5 billion). It is noticeable to mention that dairy products have been soaked from 7 billion in 2000 to nearly 10 billion in 2017 and it will drop to 9.5 in 2050. Also, the bar chart visibly demonstrate that meat products has been consistently decreased as it was 6 billion in 2000 and it will be 5 billion in 2050.
It is apparent from the bar chart that southland’s major export will spectacularly surge in 2050, while meat products have been dipped during this period. In addition, dairy products have been rocketed from 2000 to 2017 and it will drop in 2050.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2000 to 2017 and it will drop in 2050.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84489475962 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.423645320197 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7334951505 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135463556858 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869608302716 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055836841314 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108230011403 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368670759918 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.