some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. they say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. to what extend do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Nowadays not all people’s rubbish is recycled and some believe that it is government’s responsibility to make some law to provoke people recycle their waste. According to statistics encouraging people to recycle could have more benefits both for people and society than only put it on the hands of government. There are two main reasons why it is beneficial to raise one’s enthusiasm to recycle their waste as it is national capital and it saves human resource.
Many people argue all the waste which has produced a lot all over the world has a function and they can be recycled; although, people exactly do not know how to recycle it. It is government’s responsibility to teach it and encourage them to do it by making some laws or give some facilities to whom do it. These days there are many online sites which sell products that are made from recycle materials such as bottle, cans, newspapers and plastic bags. For example, a lady who makes clocks from bottles and the clocks which do not work and sells them online. Also, a guy who makes toys with plastic bags. Therefore, if people understand that waste in national capital, they will try to recycle it even if there is not any rule to make them to recycle it.
In other words, recycling waste need human resources, time and energy. All the recycling process is time consuming and need labor work to do it. Also, these labors need wage. So, if government make some rules and laws, everyone will recycle its waste. Therefore, if people recycle their trash, human resource will be used in other major work.
In conclusion, it is claimed that government first should look below the surface of the society to see what people know about recycling then try to change people’s view about recycling and make some rules for recycling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 761, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot any rule to make them to recycle it. In other words, recycling waste need hum...
^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ource will be used in other major work. In conclusion, it is claimed that govern...
^^^
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ling and make some rules for recycling.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82958199357 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69155841838 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520900321543 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5746030788 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.133333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446323101602 0.244688304435 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152732015893 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772796912856 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285383828666 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373097540174 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.