The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The table obviously illustrates how many people have visited Ashdown Museum one year before restoration and one year after it. Also, the bar charts clearly demonstrate the analyses of people's consent about their visit to the museum. As it can be observed at the first glance, the number of visitors and their contentment of the museum has climbed.
The most evident information is that 74000 people visited the museum a year before renovation and it dramatically soak to a high of 92000 a year after renewal. The surveys visibly indicate that 15 people were very pleased with their visit while this number had increased to 35 after refurbishment. Also, individuals who were very dissatisfied and dissatisfied were plummeted respectively 10 to 5 and 40 to 15. Visitors who did not respond were remain steadily 5. In addition, viewing the bar chart, it shows a significant rise in the number of contented visitors.
It is apparent from the table and the bar charts that people who enjoyed their visit at the museum a year after renovation had surged in comparison with a year before repair.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'soaks'?
Suggestion: soaks
...r before renovation and it dramatically soak to a high of 92000 a year after renewal...
^^^^
Line 2, column 440, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
... 40 to 15. Visitors who did not respond were remain steadily 5. In addition, viewin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9402173913 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76176273639 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5452522813 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368028927653 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145669430163 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623545241296 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263312184604 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0125586340265 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.