The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The given chart shows the age-wise contribution of British people to charity in percentage for the years 1990 and 2010.
Overall, people below 50 years donated more in 1990 than in 2010 whereas contribution of the population older than 50 years was greater in 2010 comparing to 1990.
In the year 1990, the amount spent to charity fluctuated with age group. About 42% was given for good cause by the people around 36-50 years old which was the highest among all the age groups. The youngest ones below 25 years expended almost 16% for social cause marking the lowest one. The contribution was approximately 30%, 35% and 32% for people belonging to age groups 26-35, 51-65 and >65 respectively.
Looking at the year 2010, the first rank in donation was held by people who were 51-65 years old. Similar to 1990, the bottom position was occupied by folks younger than 25, having their share of about 7%. Equal amount was expended by the British ageing 36-50 and greater than 65 which accounts to 35%. A little less than 25% was contributed by those who are from 26 to 35 years old.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was greater in 2010 comparing to 1990. In the year 1990, the amount spent to ch...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70680628272 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32485494648 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570680628272 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.2454119371 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.9 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209777862522 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106042697678 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869469223668 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182379285866 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930596282065 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.