The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph demonstrates the portion of British citizens' contributions to charity based on their age in two different years - 1990 and 2010.
Overall, it is noticeable that British people donated more in the past. Nevertheless, the old people aged 51 and above indeed give away more money, meanwhile young people who belonged to the 18-25 age group donated the least in the given period.
In 1990, people aged 36-50 contributed the highest amount of money to charity, with 42% being noticed. Likewise, the 51-65 age group stood at second position with 35% for their hospitality. The 26-35 age group followed a similar pattern with people aged above 65, with 31% and 32% respectively. Lastly, the smallest ratio of 17% went to youth.
After two decades, the generosity level of citizens aged 26-35 dropped slightly to 35%, equivalent to the percentage of elderly people above 65. Remarkably, the 51-65 age group has shown a significant increase of nearly 40% in 2010. Conversely, two youngest groups, 18-25 and 26-35 had a mere minority of aid, with only 7% and 24% recorded.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-26 | cinderel | view | |
| 2023-03-05 | hahannguyen | view | |
| 2023-03-05 | hahannguyen | view | |
| 2023-01-23 | Nicole Yu | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-19 | Punm | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 78
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Advertising is all around us it is an unavoidable part of everyone s life Some people say that advertising is a positive part of our lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, lastly, likewise, nevertheless, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99444444444 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63759938137 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4942248824 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180714183289 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736919758012 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505703975479 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119982028491 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389994055348 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.