The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 (%).
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words
The bar chart illustrates several important living issues faced by the residents of seven major UK cities [Glasgow, Belfast, Birmingham, Cardiff, Manchester, Glasgow, and London] in 2008. Units are given in percentage.
Overall, issues related to health services proved to be the most important in almost all major cities, which is followed very closely by education and training. Meanwhile, list worrisome of all the issues was air pollution. Which is almost five times lesser to the residents of all metropolitan cities.
Regarding health services, out of seven cities six cities residents stated it is their primary living issue. Which is above 50% of all the three combined problems. Except in Glasgow where it is just under 50%. Education and training is very much close to health services problem, by approximately 10% difference between them. With the exemption of Glasgow [53%] and London [52%] whom it had become the most troublesome problem to the inhabitants.
With respect to air pollution, out of all major cities only Manchester [16%], London [14%] and Cardiff [12%], which indicates more than 10% of their residents shown concerned. Furthermore Newcastle city recorded only 5% residents stated this as an issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...me of all the issues was air pollution. Which is almost five times lesser to the resi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tated it is their primary living issue. Which is above 50% of all the three combined ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...10% of their residents shown concerned. Furthermore Newcastle city recorded only 5% residen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, so, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35051546392 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71635301572 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.9366265047 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0954763887096 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033414806793 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367204730327 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636986520901 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353837570106 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.