Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children).
Do you agree or disagree?
The vision of the education system should concentrate on holistic development of the children. Few people thinks that volunteering in society development works should be made part of the school curriculum. This essay agrees with that suggestion completely.
To start with, the education what students are receiving must not be limited to the classroom teaching. Where, pupils will learn only about the numerous subjects. Even though by this system, students will pursue their schooling with good grades but it will be lacking in morale values. Hence by keeping the overall development of the student and to improve the student’s perspective towards numerous problems which are presently facing by society. The education system should include various activities through which they can learn about serving less fortunate people by engaging them in charity works, helping younger generations to improve their sports skills.
In addition to this, the wards who involves in community service not only gain morale values but also substantially helps them in their future career. Since many of the companies and universities are deliberately looking forward for the unique students with different qualities. Further, if students willing to pursue higher education, lot of reputed universities gives weightage to these type of students. For example, Cambridge and Oxford universities receives thousands of application every year. Since they need to accept small percentage applicants, universities look for the students who has done some quality work outside the classroom.
In conclusion, teenagers should be made to involve in charitable community service in their school curriculum.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t be limited to the classroom teaching. Where, pupils will learn only about the numer...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 286, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ut it will be lacking in morale values. Hence by keeping the overall development of t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68650793651 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82348729391 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626984126984 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4336821606 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.357142857 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203203502019 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659982509269 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531775458391 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13217318377 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350328571279 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.