The chart below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the average proportions in general meals in the USA of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars that if eaten too much, it may be not good for health.
In general, it is clear that the average percentages in dinner of sodium and saturated fat is highest while the proportion in snacks of added sugar make up the the most remarkable figure.
The consuming in dinner of sodium comprises the vast majority of the total, at 43%, followed by that of the consuming in lunch, at 29%. The average proportion of snacks and breakfast was the same at 14%.
The consuming in dinner of saturated fat is much higher than that of added sugar, 37% compared to 23%. The average percentage in lunch of saturated fat is slightly higher than that of added sugar, 26% comparison in 19%. In contrast, the average proportion in snacks of added sugar is two times higher than that of saturated fat, 42% compared on 21%. The percentages in breakfast of both saturated fat and added sugar is the same, at 16%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 92, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the highest'.
Suggestion: is the highest
...s in dinner of sodium and saturated fat is highest while the proportion in snacks of added...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ortion in snacks of added sugar make up the the most remarkable figure. The consuming ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ortion in snacks of added sugar make up the the most remarkable figure. The consuming ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...cks and breakfast was the same at 14%. The consuming in dinner of saturated fat is...
^^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...at of added sugar, 37% compared to 23%. The average percentage in lunch of saturate...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63333333333 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52716109694 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472222222222 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5316428407 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109422593144 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597121340219 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588060455446 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861825461841 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684892959285 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.